Israel’s attack on Iran has left a terrible regime with only terrible options — and created a narrow path to a better outcome ...

There are growing tensions in the conservative movement over whether President Donald Trump should agree to a new nuclear ...

The attacks bore the twin hallmarks of Israeli military actions under Netanyahu: Tactically brilliant but lacking any strategic vision ...

Israel's attack on Iran began as a campaign against its nuclear program but has already begun to morph into something far riskier: regime change. It is staking its strategy on deep US involvement, but ...

The president had asked Israel to hold off. Now he’s scrambling to make a deal in negotiations that have become even more ...

They died in their own beds. Hossein Salami and Ali Shamkhani—Iran’s most senior military officers and the stewards of Iran’s ...

This deal isn’t just about nuclear weapons. It’s about the future of the Middle East, the credibility of US foreign policy, and the strength of American leadership.

Israel’s latest strike on Iran had nothing to do with dismantling the Iranian (civilian) nuclear program. Despite Prime ...

Iran appears ready to retaliate if it faces too much pushback. It says this could be “proportionate,” although that leaves ...

The missile and air war that Israel and Iran have spent decades planning for has come, and it is spectacular and terrifying.

The endgame of this conflict and the future of the region will be profoundly shaped by how a wounded Iran responds.