News
JoJo Siwa released a polarizing cover of Kim Carnes' 1981 hit "Bette Davis Eyes." The original singer appeared to shade the ...
The original artist behind the 1981 hit “Bette Davis Eyes” seemingly had something to say about JoJo Siwa’s cover in a ...
ET: Kim Carnes has officially weighed in on JoJo Siwa’s “Bette Davis Eyes” cover days after reportedly sharing (and deleting) ...
Kim Carnes described JoJo Siwa’s new cover version of “Bette Davis Eyes” as too close to her 1981 hit in July 2025.
JoJo Siwa covering Kim Carnes' song comes on the heels of her canceling her Pride performance and declaring that she was ...
JoJo Siwa has put her own spin on Kim Carnes’ song “Bette Davis Eyes,” and the internet has a lot to say about it. On July 10 ...
The song has been covered numerous times before; from actress Gwyneth Paltrow for the soundtrack of the 2000 film, “Duets,” ...
9h
PinkNews on MSNKim Carnes says JoJo Siwa’s ‘Bette Davis Eyes’ cover is ‘a bit too close’ to originalKim Carnes has spoken out about JoJo Siwa’s cover of her 1981 hit, “Bette Davis Eyes”, and she thinks it’s “a bit too close” to the original. Last week, the former Dance Moms star released her cover ...
23h
EarlyGame on MSNKim Carnes Calls Out Jojo Siwa's ‘Bette Davis Eyes' Cover: "There Is A Difference Between Singing A Song … And Embodying It"JoJo Siwa's recent controversial cover of the 1981 hit "Bette Davis Eyes" has been criticised by none other than Kim Carnes, the original singer. In a now-deleted Instagram Reel, Carnes suggested that ...
5d
Complex on MSNJojo Siwa Covered ‘Bette Davis Eyes' and Fans Have a Lot To SayKim Carnes' 1981 classic "Bette Davis Eyes" got a refresh this week courtesy of Jojo Siwa. The 22-year-old former child star ...
JoJo Siwa is in her retro era - and TikTok has some questions. Specifically: when did the once-rainbow-clad queer icon enter the trad wife pipeline? Last week, the 22-year-old shared a TikTok of her ...
JoJo has since spoken out and her boyfriend, Chris Hughes, has defended the cover. Now, Kim Carnes appears to have revealed ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results