Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. It’s the age-old question: Does the Supreme Court decide its cases based on rank partisanship rather than legal principles?
Hosted on MSN
Supreme Court To Lower Courts: Ignore Actual Binding Precedent, Follow Our Unexplained Shadow Docket Vibes Instead
The Supreme Court’s shadow docket has become a lawless mess. The justices are issuing extremely consequential rulings with either no explanation at all, or with barely a paragraph of reasoning. No ...
Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. This article was updated on June 20 The Supreme Court on Monday added two new cases to its docket for the 2025-26 term, both ...
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court sounded open on March 24 to letting the federal government send back asylum-seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border, although the justices also debated whether they can even ...
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Maybe a more useful and illuminating way ...
On March 12, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals issued a landmark decision interpreting the District’s Anti-SLAPP Act, the statutory scheme directed at deterring Strategic Lawsuits Against ...
Superior Court Judge Eric M. Davis concluded Dominion is entitled to summary judgment on the issue of falsity of the conservative news network's statements it made saying the voting technology company ...
The trial features the family members of three women who died of ovarian cancer after decades of using Johnson & Johnson’s ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results